mbse:modelmgt
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
mbse:modelmgt [2016/02/01 22:32] lvanzandt |
mbse:modelmgt [2016/12/28 08:31] (current) lvanzandt [Activity Pages] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| * The industry no longer suffers from the lack of adequate collaborative modeling and decision-making systems | * The industry no longer suffers from the lack of adequate collaborative modeling and decision-making systems | ||
| - | ==== Where's The IRR? ==== | + | ==== What's the IRR? ==== |
| - | The measure of success perhaps of most interest to managers and modelers alike is: internal rate of return, the implied rate where the cost of the total time that model eliminates from the acquisition and maintenance of a system exceeds the cost of the time spent actually creating a model: | + | The measure of success perhaps of most interest to managers and modelers alike is: the implied internal rate of return, the rate at which the economic gains from the use of the model begins to exceed the economic costs of the development and maintenance of that model: |
| - | IRR = { r | m1, m2, and 0 == NPV( savings in labor and schedule of system due to existence of model, m1 ) - NPV( cost in labor and schedule to create and maintain model, m2 ) } | + | {{ :mbse:modeling_internal_rate_of_return.png | Internal Rate of Return}} |
| - | Note that the prices of money m1 and m2 may differ over the different intervals during which the model is developed and maintained and during which any labor and maintenance costs of the system are accrued. | + | During the creation of a model, a certain amount of time is spent with overhead items like check-in, check-out, copying files, and deciphering complexity and relevance. The more time spent with these actions compared to the overall saved time, the less time is spent actually using a model and -- most importantly -- the less time spent actually achieving business goals and contributing to the business value. |
| - | + | Generally, when the IRR for a tactic is lower than the forecast price of money over the durations of consideration, then an enterprise may be better of not using the tactic because they'd earn a better return simply by banking the costs of development. | |
| - | During the creation of a model, a certain amount of time is spent with overhead items like check-in, check-out, copying files, and deciphering complexity and relevance. The more time spent with these actions compared to the overall saved time, the less time is spent actually using a model and -- most importantly -- the less time spent actually achieving business goals and contributing to the business value. | + | |
| ===== Upcoming events ===== | ===== Upcoming events ===== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
| {{ :mbse:vision_slide_for_iw2016.png?480|The MLM AT Vision as of 2016 }} | {{ :mbse:vision_slide_for_iw2016.png?480|The MLM AT Vision as of 2016 }} | ||
| - | * INCOSE IW2016, 30 January 2016, Agenda {{:mbse:incose_mlm_meeting_agenda_30_january_2016.xlsx||here}} | + | * INCOSE IW2017, 28 January 2017, Torrance, CA |
| - | * Team Call, 04 December 2015, Agenda {{:mbse:incose_mlm_meeting_agenda_04_december_2015.xlsx||here}} | + | |
| Line 64: | Line 63: | ||
| * [2003] Tools Interoperability ConOps {{https://connect.incose.org/WorkingGroups/TII/SAWG%20Shared%20Documents/TIIWG%20Work%20Products/ISEE%20SRD%20and%20CONOPS/ISEE_Conops%20022003.DOC|here}} | * [2003] Tools Interoperability ConOps {{https://connect.incose.org/WorkingGroups/TII/SAWG%20Shared%20Documents/TIIWG%20Work%20Products/ISEE%20SRD%20and%20CONOPS/ISEE_Conops%20022003.DOC|here}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== PLM4MBSE Working Group ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * {{:mbse:plm4mbse_position_paper_v1_0_july_2015.pdf|"10 theses about MBSE and PLM", July 2015 V1.0 Version}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== OMG SE DSIG Papers ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * {{:mbse:modelmgt:mwg_plm_se_paper.pdf|"Virtually Indistinguishable Systems Engineering and PLM", IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012 Version}} | ||
| ===== White Papers ===== | ===== White Papers ===== | ||
| Line 74: | Line 81: | ||
| * {{:mbse:incose_is_2014_mm_paper_review_.pdf|"Model Lifecycle Management for MBSE", Reviewers summary}} | * {{:mbse:incose_is_2014_mm_paper_review_.pdf|"Model Lifecycle Management for MBSE", Reviewers summary}} | ||
| - | ==== PLM4MBSE Working Group ==== | ||
| - | * {{:mbse:plm4mbse_position_paper_v1_0_july_2015.pdf|"10 theses about MBSE and PLM", July 2015 V1.0 Version}} | ||
| ===== Pre-2014 Collaboration Site ===== | ===== Pre-2014 Collaboration Site ===== | ||
| Line 87: | Line 92: | ||
| ===== Activity Pages ===== | ===== Activity Pages ===== | ||
| + | * Topical Guide to the IW2017 events of the TIMLM Working Group [[mbse:modelmgt:topics_iw2017|Here]] | ||
| + | * Event Report for IS 2016 [[mbse:modelmgt:report_is2016|Here]] | ||
| * Panel Preparation for IS 2016 [[mbse:modelmgt:panel_is2016|Here]] | * Panel Preparation for IS 2016 [[mbse:modelmgt:panel_is2016|Here]] | ||
| * MLM-S Stakeholders Analysis [[mbse:modelmgt:stakeholders|Here]] | * MLM-S Stakeholders Analysis [[mbse:modelmgt:stakeholders|Here]] | ||
| Line 99: | Line 106: | ||
| ===== History ===== | ===== History ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ==== 30 January 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 1) ==== | ==== 30 January 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 1) ==== | ||
| Line 112: | Line 121: | ||
| === Notes === | === Notes === | ||
| - | * Attendees included: | + | * Session included a review of the panel presentation artifacts including the CFP requirements, the Whereas statement, the list of candidate panelists, the CVs of the panelists, and the position statements of the candidates. |
| + | * Attendees included: | ||
| * Adrian Whitfield, IBM | * Adrian Whitfield, IBM | ||
| - | ** Nerijus Jankevicius, No Magic | + | * Nerijus Jankevicius, No Magic |
| - | ** Aurelijus Morkevicius, No Magic | + | * Aurelijus Morkevicius, No Magic |
| - | ** Saulius Pavalkis, No Magic | + | * Saulius Pavalkis, No Magic |
| - | ** Dirk Zwemer, Intercax | + | * Dirk Zwemer, Intercax |
| - | ** Len Wozniak, General Motors | + | * Len Wozniak, General Motors |
| - | ** Derek Piette, PTC | + | * Derek Piette, PTC |
| - | ** Stephanie Chiesi, Raytheon | + | * Stephanie Chiesi, Raytheon |
| - | ** Mark Sampson, Siemens | + | * Mark Sampson, Siemens |
| - | ** Tomas Huldt, TMC Consulting | + | * Tomas Huldt, TMC Consulting |
| - | ** John Nallon, CSC | + | * John Nallon, CSC |
| - | ** Jonathan Rigaud, Airbus | + | * Jonathan Rigaud, Airbus |
| - | ** Bob Kenley, Purdue | + | * Bob Kenley, Purdue |
| - | ** Willie Wilson, Aerojet Rocketdyne | + | * Willie Wilson, Aerojet Rocketdyne |
| + | * Lonnie VanZandt, Sodius | ||
| ==== 01 February 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 3) ==== | ==== 01 February 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 3) ==== | ||
| - | Attendees: | + | === Notes === |
| - | * Len Wozniak, General Motors | + | * Morning Session was a discussion about work occurring in peer teams including the NAFEM-INCOSE and the Agile SE teams. John Nallon of the Tools Interoperability Working Group spoke about the Survey research, the Requirements and ConOps preparation, and the work with STEP and PDES. |
| - | * Derek Piette, PTC | + | |
| - | * John Nallon, CSC | + | * Lonnie advised the attendees that the session was transitioning from presentations to work sessions. Lonnie described the wiki tactics for recording elicited capabilities, stakeholders, and operations. |
| - | * Willie Wilson, Aerojet Rocketdyne | + | |
| - | * Bryan Pflug, Flug | + | * After lunch, a diligent few worked on some of the ConOps artifacts. Lonnie also represented the team's charter to newcomers Donna Nystrom and Hans Peter de Koning. |
| - | * Brett Nadler, University of San Diego | + | |
| - | * John Palmer, Boeing | + | * Attendees: |
| - | * Lonnie VanZandt, Sodius | + | * Len Wozniak, General Motors |
| - | * Donna Nystrom, Aerospace Corporation | + | * Derek Piette, PTC |
| - | * Don Tolle, CIMData | + | * John Nallon, CSC |
| - | * Hans Peter de Koning, EESA | + | * Willie Wilson, Aerojet Rocketdyne |
| + | * Bryan Pflug, Flug | ||
| + | * Brett Nadler, University of San Diego | ||
| + | * John Palmer, Boeing | ||
| + | * Lonnie VanZandt, Sodius | ||
| + | * Donna Nystrom, Aerospace Corporation | ||
| + | * Don Tolle, CIMData | ||
| + | * Hans Peter de Koning, EESA | ||
| ==== 02 February 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 4) ==== | ==== 02 February 2016 INCOSE IW (Day 4) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== 04 December 2015, Team Call ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Agenda {{:mbse:incose_mlm_meeting_agenda_04_december_2015.xlsx||here}} | ||
| ==== Model Management Telecon - 2015 September 04 ==== | ==== Model Management Telecon - 2015 September 04 ==== | ||
mbse/modelmgt.1454383949.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/02/01 22:32 by lvanzandt
Page Tools
